A 19 year old student spent 48 hours researching the broker discovery problem in India — @nithin I'd love your honest take

Hey everyone — and @nithin if you happen to see this, I’d genuinely love your perspective.

I’m Sanketh, a 19 year old engineering student based near Bengaluru. 48 hours ago I watched The Wolf of Wall Street, got curious about the broking world, and somehow ended up doing what I think is the most intense 2 days of research I’ve ever done in my life.

Here’s the problem I keep coming back to:

Zerodha, Groww and Upstox have done something incredible — they made investing accessible to 200 million Indians. But they solved the platform problem. There’s still a human problem nobody has cleanly solved.

Millions of first time retail investors don’t just want an app. They want a person they can trust. Someone who understands their goals, guides their decisions, and is accountable. But finding that person today is still entirely word of mouth — uncle’s recommendation, colleague’s contact, random WhatsApp forward.

There’s no reliable way to:

  • Discover SEBI verified independent brokers and RIAs in one place
  • Compare them by actual verified performance data
  • See genuine client reviews before trusting someone with your money
  • Understand fee structures upfront

And on the broker side the problem is just as real. I spent the last 48 hours reaching out to 60+ SEBI registered brokers across India via WhatsApp and email. Here’s what I found:

Three separate firms had already shut down or never started operating at all — which tells me the independent broking model is under more pressure than the registered numbers suggest.

But one active independent broker answered my questions directly and honestly:

  1. How do you find new clients? — “Only referrals”
  2. How do you manage client communication? — “WhatsApp and calls”
  3. What’s the most frustrating part of your practice? — “Compliance. Over regulations.”

When I followed up she added something that really stuck with me — that compliance support would matter more to full member brokers than to sub-brokers like herself. Which means the pain points are completely different depending on where you sit in the broking hierarchy.

So here’s what I think I’m building:

A two sided marketplace — think Practo but for SEBI registered brokers and RIAs. Investors can discover, compare and connect with verified brokers. Brokers get a structured pipeline of quality clients plus tools to manage compliance. The trust layer is built on verified performance data pulled via the Account Aggregator framework — not self reported numbers, not fake reviews.

@nithin — I have a few specific questions I’d love your honest take on if you have a moment:

  1. From Zerodha’s scale, do you see retail investors genuinely struggling to find trustworthy human advisers? Or do most people just want to self serve?

  2. Is the Account Aggregator framework mature enough today to actually power verified broker performance ratings or is that still years away?

  3. Is there a regulatory reason this kind of marketplace hasn’t been built properly in India yet — SEBI liability, RIA framework restrictions, something else?

  4. Do you think the independent broker model has a real future in India or is it slowly being squeezed out by zero brokerage platforms?

And for everyone else in this community — I’m still very early and still very wrong about a lot of things. If you’ve built something in this space before and it failed, I genuinely want to know why. If you think this is a terrible idea, tell me that too.

I have my engineering end sems starting in 4 days so I’ll be going quiet for 3 weeks after this. But I’ll be back on 20th June to pick this up properly.

Thanks for reading this far.

Sanketh

1 Like

In your enthusiasm to discuss a newfound domain,
please do not spam the forum with redundant posts.

Maybe stick to a single topic thread to share your thoughts,
and consider the lack of responses as a form of implicit feedback as well.

Good Luck with your exams. :+1:

4 Likes

Fair point, noted. I’ll consolidate everything into one thread going forward. Thanks for the feedback and the wishes! :+1:

If you are looking for complete advice / financial planning - check this https://www.feeonlyindia.com/list-of-fee-only-planners

If the focus is on stocks only - https://smallcase.zerodha.com/

Thank you Gowtham, this is really helpful!

I’ve looked at feeonlyindia.com before — it’s a good directory but from what I can see it’s mostly a static list without verified performance data, client reviews, or any real way to compare advisers side by side. The investor still has to do a lot of manual research after finding a name.

What I’m exploring is more dynamic — verified performance data pulled via Account Aggregator, a proper review system, and a matching layer that suggests advisers based on the investor’s specific goals.

Would you say feeonlyindia.com solves the trust problem well enough or do you still find it hard to evaluate planners from that list?

1 Like

There are less than 1500 sebi RIAs in India. And RIA is the only model who can give right financial advise, all others (banks, brokers, agents, IFAs) have a conflict of interest. Not that RIAs advise will give good returns, but they dont have a bias in recommending a specific product.

Somewhere I read there are less than 200 individual RIAs in practice. Huge compliance is a let down for them. Also not all are ready to pay for (right) advise
All this leads to investors trying DYI or seeking agents (with conflict of interest). Now you can understand the investing problem in India.

2 Likes

Gowtham this is genuinely the most insightful response I’ve received through this entire research process. Thank you.

The point about less than 200 active RIAs in practice is something I hadn’t fully grasped. And the compliance burden driving them out of practice is exactly what one of the active brokers I spoke to confirmed independently.

This actually raises a bigger question for me — if RIAs are the only truly unbiased advisers but compliance is killing the category, should a platform like BrokerBridge focus specifically on helping RIAs survive and scale? Or is the market too small to build a viable business around 200 active practitioners?

Would genuinely love your honest take on this.

This was what i indirectly trying to convey. Unless this TAM raises, there is a little scope for a platform to viably run on this space.

1 Like

That’s a fair and honest assessment Gowtham — and I completely agree the RIA market alone is too small to build a viable business around.

But BrokerBridge’s actual target isn’t limited to RIAs. The real market is the much larger pool of sub-brokers, authorised persons and growth oriented independent broking firms across India — estimated at 50,000+ registered practitioners.

RIAs would be a premium tier on the platform — included but not the core market.

Does that change your view on TAM viability?

Trustworthy human advisers, it sounds like an oxymoron, especially in the current scenario, where advisory is done by distributors. Ideally speaking, advisors should have no vested interest in selling the product. They need to charge an advisory fee. But the problem with India is that no one likes paying advisory fees, whereas they pay infinitely more in distribution.

So, there are fewer than 1000 advisors (RIA) for a population of crores, and there are lakhs of distributors (MF, Insurance, etc.). The problem is how to create a revenue model for RIAs to survive and thrive.

Account aggregator, yep its there.

As I mentioned earlier, the question is how to get RIAs to survive. Unless they can, there’s no point building a marketplace.

What do you mean by independent broker model?

4 Likes

Hi @nithin
Thank you for responding it means the world to me
By independent broker model i mean a single person who is a broker that is he is not under anybody ( sub broker)

And comming back to the idea of building a market place it is not just only for RIAs but it includes them aswell with sub and independent brokers cause i found there are nearly 50,000+ brokers and 2 million demat accounts in india so there is a clear gap to connect them in a nutshell it is CRM for the industry of brokerage

And from the research done till now i have contacted around 60 brokers and they say client aquistion is only through referrals and word of mouth so ideally this platform is for brokers who want to scale that or are just getting started that is who have registered for less than 3 or 5 years

And also about account Aggregator i have reached out to 3 to 4 companies(onemoney and setu and etc) which provide this and i have got a positive feedback that is it is possible the only catch this needs be licensed by any regulatory bodies like RBI, SEBI, IRDAI, or PFRDA

And one of the broker of Mumbai who i had a conversation with told me that SEBI compliance is a huge problem so i have designed ot to slove it aswell by giving frequent reminders and other features

I have attached screenshot of the website ( really basic version as it is just in the ideation phase ) please go through it aswell and building a website is not really a matter to build as a compsci student

And finally what are your views on this idea your knowledge of the market makes you the most credible source i have spoken to so your opinion gives me valuable insights on the idea

Looking forward to your reply

Thank you agian @nithin it means soo much to me
Sanketh





Ah, no, there are no 50,000+ sub brokers or APs. If you look at the markets, the top 10 brokers account for over 90% of clients, and, except for 1 of them, I don’t think anyone does this SubBroker business anymore. Also, regulations have become so strict that it is very difficult for sub-brokers to manage portfolios as they used to before (until 2019). So most APs now just handle the introduction to the client’s business and are not in any way involved in what the client does later, and even if they do, they don’t/can’t trade on a client’s behalf.

But, subbrokers aren’t trustworthy because they have a conflict: they make money when you trade. It is a wrong hypothesis to begin with.

4 Likes

@nithin , this is exactly the kind of honest feedback I needed and couldn’t have gotten from anyone else. Thank you.

You’ve essentially identified the flaw in my hypothesis — sub-brokers and APs aren’t a viable supply side because of regulatory changes post 2019 and the inherent conflict of interest in their model.

So if I understand correctly, the real opportunity is on the RIA side — fewer than 1000 active practitioners, unbiased model, but struggling to survive because:

  1. Compliance burden is overwhelming
  2. Indians resist paying explicit advisory fees
  3. No infrastructure to help them build sustainable practices

Would it make sense then to build specifically for RIAs — not a discovery marketplace but a practice infrastructure platform? Something that solves compliance, client acquisition, and helps them build a fee based revenue model that actually works?

Is that a problem you think is worth solving — or is the RIA model itself fundamentally broken in the Indian context?

Yep, before you build a marketplace, you need to figure out a business model that will help RIAs survive and thrive. If you are solving for it, maybe do it with just 1 RIA or a small bunch of them. If you can solve their monetisation issues, you would have really solved a problem. I think many people will come to your platform to become RIAs if you can solve it.

2 Likes

@nithin thank you for this — starting with 1 RIA and solving their monetisation problem before building a marketplace makes complete sense.

After your previous reply I reached out to a few more advisers. One of them — an industry insider — told me to focus on AUM based and commission based advisers rather than fixed fee RIAs, because they have the economics to actually sustain a platform.

That raises my question more specifically,
If the target is AUM based advisers and MFDs rather than pure fee-only RIAs — does the business model become more viable? They make real money, they have real compliance burden, and they’d potentially pay for tools that help them manage clients and grow their AUM.

Or is the conflict of interest in their model — making money when clients trade — too fundamental a problem for a trust based platform to solve?

@nithin Looking forward to some more valuable insights form you

Thank you
Sanketh

Bro spent the week before engineering finals watching a funny but unrealistic movie and chatting 2 days straight with an LLM getting AI psychosis. :face_with_spiral_eyes:

Hey
Thank you for that criticism and yes i know i might be right or wrong so and yes i did use an LLM it is true i agree but it doesn’t mean that i am dependent on it completely and the movie reference is true i just watched it and yes - it is unrealistic , and even if i am wrong atleast i tried , it makes me happy

1 Like

Hi @VijayNair
I had come across alphaquark.in previously while doing my research

What separates what i am trying to buld and them is that they are like shopify but for this industry , there the RIAs can build thier own platform and launch it but here they should just register and start using it our onboarding of client is designed to be easy and the maintenance part of the website is also managed by us at a minimal cost of operation

And one more thing - they are just targeting RIAs but we are targeting MFDs aswell

And i am still in the research phase your response has really helped
Thank you
Sanketh

AlphaQuark handles all compliances for RA and RIA.

Doesnt mean you should not build it, if costs involved are less (using AI and stuff)

1 Like