Man the AI battle of words is ON big time 
5 Likes
Thank you for the demonstration.
You have some nerve, to say that after you have consistently copy pasted AI rebuttals
2 Likes
I can understand why no one takes you and your group seriously—keep bluffing, though. Maybe someone will buy it eventually.
Ah yes, the classic Dunning-Kruger projection - because you depend on AI, you assume we all do. How… predictable.
1 Like
Dude, you are not fooling anyone… Give it up!
2 Likes
Share your verified P&L to suhas or shut up. Guessing you’ll pick option two.
2 Likes
I already told you. I dont like to post it publicly, but if you send me an email sincerely apologising for your bad behaviour and ask nicely, I definitely will share it privately 
Offer is still open 
2 Likes
Ah yes, the world is clearly split into two camps, those who trade, and those who can count past ten without taking their shoes off. Groundbreaking.
That’s exactly my point , you’re defending the comfort of theory over the discomfort of exposure. Nothing wrong with preferring research, but let’s not pretend contribution without consequence carries the same weight as having capital and reputation on the line. Markets reward results, not intentions, and the fact you frame skin in the game as ‘overused’ says plenty about which side of that divide you live on.
Oh absolutely, because no one’s ever made money outside an algorithm. Next you’ll tell me art is useless because cameras exist.
3 Likes
Then stop dancing 
1 Like
Cognitive dissonance in its purest form - you’re literally proving my point while thinking you’re clever.
I am off this thread. Good luck to you, hope you get good feedback 
1 Like
Thanks for the free career advice—maybe invest that energy into luring actual customers for your ‘courses’.
Keep going. Someone might actually report this behavior to WorldQuant. Then you wont be so rude anymore eh. I don’t have the time to do such things, but there are others here who might do it. I am trying to tell you what the internet has become, but you don’t seem to want to learn. Keep up the sarcasm and behavior. Always remember - actions have consequences.
Report it yourself if you actually believe it—or are you just here for theatrics?
Oh I dont have the time to report it. I am here for the theatrics and try and help those who are clearly ignorant because of their bloated ego.
I could, but you are not worth it. I will share the email IDs here for others who might want to. Let others do what they feel is right.
One quick search could get the email IDs of higher-ups as well but it is not mine to share. These IDs are already available on their site.
BTW this is my last message about you or these threads. I will be blocking you now. You will soon learn that actions have consequences and if play with fire, you will get burnt. All the best!
1 Like
Do you need the email IDs of all the firms interviewing me next? Funny how obsessed you are with my career while yours seems stuck auditing others. Don’t worry—my track record speaks for itself. Stay tuned.
This topic is temporarily closed for at least 4 hours due to a large number of community flags.
This topic was automatically opened after 8 hours.
I’ve worked with Worldquant for more than 2+ years and created multiple alphas from their backtester.
WQ uses those alphas to do statistical arbitrage and backtest is accordingly, In statistical arbitrage multiple positions are taken across instruments.
For ex: In the image you shared, It has ~1500 long & short positions ~total = 3000 positions
This is impossible to recreate for a retail trader like you even if you are somehow able to get the raw data for your usecase.
Even if you get a good alpha and results, it would practically be of no use for your capital. Hope this helps.
2 Likes