As informed previously, the exchange circular states it to block 200%, and it’s not from our end.
FYI, this 200% margin will be blocked only if the scrip is in IBC stage 1. After March 3, 2026, there is no 200% margin block. OFS was conducted on March 17, so there is no additional margin block.
Let the authorities investigate if any manipulation, circular trade, price rigging involved or not.
They don’t allow " as per their policy " as if they are the super power above exchanges and regulator, pretending that they are protecting investors from buying risky stocks.
F and O means? Still risky. But not bothered to protect investors from F and O risks.
Noe Zerodha hold 55 lakh quantity. Still under survelance of BE. Still protecting investors from buying… 
It seems that they have no plan to sell at all. Hope they will hold those 55 lakh qty as long as world exists.
You are making this a little more complicated than it is.
Zerodha is openly saying they bought the shares after March 3, when the stock was out of the IBC restriction and retail investors could buy it. So there should be some trust in what they are openly communicating.
If you think there is some other reason or the information is wrong and pointing it publicly in the open forum, you should have some credible source, just share the source or proof for it.
A basic google search will give you this.
Zerodha rejected buy orders and allowed sell orders. Reason " protect buyers from risky stocks ". But without buyer, there is no selling will take place. So while allowing selling of the stock in their trading app, they are aware that some buyers will need to buy those quantity. So why there is a " selective protection "
They are protecting some buyers and exposing some other buyers to risk by allowing selling?
You can try to justify the broker at your level best. But a lot of questions remains there
Maybe they’re allowing their existing invested clients to exit while not allowing any new entrants. I don’t see anything inherently illegal about that, it could simply be a case of the broker protecting its clients. Or maybe I’m being too naive and missing something here.
but not their clients though! 
What is the point of trolling someone who raises a question?
At the very least, he spotted something that the rest of you never did.
Instead of trolling him, why not ask Zerodha why they took such a bet?
What made Zerodha Broking buy a stake of over 1% in Swan Defence when the company was on the verge of bankruptcy?
Investors are investors. Itd immature and childish to label their client, others client etc.
