Does losing money in Derivative Trading truly equate to "paying for experience"?

Trading Losses are often consolingly called “market tuition fees.”

However, since market variables are constantly changing, do accumulated losses actually translate to meaningful experience / lessons, or are they simply Lost money?

With constantly shifting market conditions and regulations, do losses truly build experience?

What’s your take: Yes or No?

4 Likes

History may not repeat itself, but it often rhymes.

5 Likes

I would say yes, but only if you actually learn from the losses. Market conditions have been shifting constantly, especially over the last couple of years, and I feel there’s been a lot more uncertainty since 2024. You can’t really avoid a bad trade, but keeping a note of what went wrong, why you took the trade, what changed and what actually caused the loss can make a huge difference over time…

If you are experiencing all these different market conditions early in your trading journey and actually tracking them, those losses can end up becoming pretty valuable experiences like tuition fees paid to the market…Otherwise, it’s just money lost :slightly_smiling_face:

3 Likes

Long story short - yes, but you may NOT be successful and success can stop and one has to adapt and manage risk


Yes, but also there is no guarantee of anything. Worst case, lesson you get is that you cant do this.

That is why - always pay less fee to market when you are learning until you have clear cut proof that you have an edge. And then scale in steps. Start with something reasonable but small, make money, increase capital reasonably, make more money and so on. Get used to drawdowns, manage risk.

If you never find an edge, never scale up. I used to trade with 1 qty SBIN for some time.

We can have systems that continue to work for decade plus. I had couple of those and they worked for 6 and 4 years going forward too. But now may have ended. So we need to adapt and also manage risk and avoid hubris when things are going well.

Finally, if you get lucky - try to compound instead of spending it all. Else one becomes a slave to the market for income and markets are fickle.

Exactly. Sometimes it stops singing old tunes too.

2 Likes

To be profitable in Derivatives Trading, you need to tick a number of boxes and experience is only one of them.

Personally, I believe yes experience pays off but paying off doesn’t mean you turn profitable just because of experience.

3 Likes

“Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is the definition of insanity”

  • Sun Tzu or some other guy
4 Likes

Well said. Experience alone wasn’t a factor in being profitable according to the recent SEBI study on retail losses in derivatives market.

4 Likes

To those who can adapt and learn, maybe…
But I mostly feel that saying is a coping mechanism :upside_down_face:

1 Like

i’d say pre-decide the tuition fees for such experience and by that i mean decide a fixed amount you can part with without loosing sleep,

say you want to take lessons, rather than risking it all on a single trade split it into 3-5 lessons or stoplosses,

hope that helps.

1 Like

But Mark Twain also lost money in Investing in stocks

1 Like

yes for me its true

1 Like

Loosing money can never be equated with the term Tuition fees, I think it sounds more like a justification for your losses and I think as a trader its a bad psychology. Yes it adds to your experience level but only if you are taking a small part of your capital as risks and loosing it. But the day the losses starts scaling up it is just poor financial planning, financial instability for a larger part of your life.

4 Likes

Why posted it if you gonna delete it?

1 Like

Posted something incorrectly so deleted it, you can check my latest comment above.

1 Like

Yes, very stupid to scale up when you are not profitable. Trouble is market rewards in zig-zag way, so just back of short term profits people can be misled and make mistakes.

Need a lot of patience and common sense. And something that actually works in the market today.

2 Likes

i think this is what , the OP has asked

1 Like

Just edit it. Deleting it does not actually delete it. We can see history still.

1 Like

While I agree, as per SEBI study, capital makes a difference. In general, large the capital, lesser the probability of losses.

While absolute amount might have increased, the percentage would still be small

2 Likes

We need to use some common sense when we interpret data.

Just increasing capital isn’t going to make anyone less likely to lose money all else being the same. People will lose more money instead. Its quite insane for an unproven trader to start trading with large capital, yet some do unfortunately.

Anyway, % of traders who lose money is very high. Anyone trying this should take it as a warning and don’t consider themselves special irrespective of successes elsewhere.

But also if you persevere through failures, windows of opportunity can be there to make good money.

3 Likes

Spoken like someone who never traded with lesser capital.

Have you traded it lesser capital ever, like less than 1L as the data says? When my capital increased I found it much easier to make money. Increased capital automatically opens up many opportunities and strategies and gives you buffer to even average down like Jason does. It’s also much easier psychologically as the damage wouldn’t matter as much. You really can’t do that with low initial capital. If you somehow attempt to do it with some strategies, the reward will be almost negligible for the effort you put in.

1 Like