Note: The following question may not be directly related to trading, but I would appreciate an explanation from the perspective of banking, and the financial system.
Main Question:
Is the total balance in all bank accounts (digital/deposit money/) necessarily equal to the total amount of physical currency and coins in existence or circulation, including currency and coins that have been lost, destroyed, or mutilated by individuals?
Answer by ChatGPT: No.
The total amount of bank deposits can be greater than the total amount of physical cash and coins actually circulating.
For example:
Suppose Customer A deposits ₹100 cash in Bank A.
Initially:
- Bank A has ₹100 cash/reserves.
- Customer A has a ₹100 bank deposit.
Now Bank A gives Ravi a ₹90 loan.
The bank does not necessarily need to receive another ₹90 cash deposit from someone else.
Instead, when it grants the loan, it records:
Bank A’s Assets:
- ₹100 cash/reserves
- ₹90 loan to Ravi
- Total = ₹190
Bank A’s Liabilities:
- ₹100 deposit of Customer A
- ₹90 deposit of Ravi
- Total = ₹190
So the balance sheet still matches:
Assets ₹190 = Liabilities ₹190
The important point is that the additional ₹90 bank deposit was created when the bank granted the ₹90 loan. It does not necessarily represent ₹90 of physical cash sitting somewhere in the banking system.
Therefore, bank deposits/digital money can exceed the amount of physical currency and coins in circulation.
But does this logic actually make sense? In other words, are banks legally and practically allowed to create a new deposit in this way when they grant a loan ?