Duty Beyond Silence

He is not naive. And likely is of sound mind.
Reasonable to assume that he did what he did knowing the effect it would have on the company and its stock.

  • Did he benefit from it?
  • Alternately was he forced to do so by someone else who benefited? Who?
  • Is this a deliberate red-herring to draw attention away from some larger problem lurking in the shadows?

A lot of guesswork right now… :person_shrugging:t4:


When one is operating on incomplete information...

here’s a handy list of techniques/frameworks to utilize -