Is it better to build an ETF portfolio with Core + Thematic ETFs or just focus on Nifty50/Next50 ETFs?
I’m in the process of building a long-term ETF portfolio and wanted to get opinions from the community.
Many experts suggest a “Core-Satellite” approach, where:
Core = Nifty50, Next50, and Liquid ETFs (70-80% allocation)
Satellite = Thematic/Factor ETFs (like PSU, Infra, FMCG, Low Volatility, Momentum, etc.)
But some argue that over the long run, sticking to Nifty50 and NiftyNext50 is good enough, and thematic plays only create extra churn and tracking error without adding much alpha.
My Questions:
Is it really worth complicating things with sector/thematic ETFs?
Has anyone here seen consistent outperformance from themes like PSU Banks, Infra, or Momentum ETFs in their portfolio?
How do you manage rebalancing between core and thematic buckets when market cycles change?
What is your allocation logic? (Core vs Thematic % split)
Would love to hear actual experiences and how people are handling this in real portfolios.
- I noticed many of you have hands-on experience with thematic ETFs. Curious to know how you personally manage the core-satellite split?
- Do you think thematic ETFs genuinely add long-term value, or is it more of a tactical play? Would love to get different viewpoints.
@VishalJain , @vasanthkamath @Meher_Smaran — I’ve seen your posts on ETF strategies. Would love to hear your take on this core vs thematic allocation dilemma.
I’ll compile a summary of different strategies people are using based on this discussion. It might help many of us build a more practical approach - refer 101 Beginner Questions — Lessons I Learned from TradingQnA - #36 by sandeep_cs