Bruh. i admire your passion for writing a reply longer than the post.
please note, my original post was about investing, not trading. (it was edited).
but, my observations apply to trading as well.
“…It seems more of anecdotal evidence…”
I provided evidence in replies.
“…These last 5 years had the mother of all bull markets…”
and yet the best returns i have observed is very underwhelming.
I agree, its not a big enough pool, its just group of 10k investors. even if you look at broader market, the best returns i observed are from bajaj finance, and it was on my radar and i invested in it. but given my principles of diversification, i could invest only part of my capital and not go all in. so back to my original point. my chances of doing multi bagger is way less than my chances of catching a falling knife.
“…Because you are doing it after they already did it ?..”
I know it sounds odd, but this is a sound strategy and actually worked well in US markets
When warren buffet started buying apple, the price was 98$. he steadily bought apple until 2020.
So, even if i bought buffet’s pick 30 days after revealation, i would have made decent money up until now. 16% pa. Without spending a single minute of my own time.
Rakesh Jhunjhunwala bought titan at 6rupees. Titan did not become a multi bagger until 2010s.
So plenty of time to buy in between. you will not get exact returns as them but close enough.
The problem now with indian investors is, most of the picks by bigwigs are smallcaps and they do upper circuit for months after the news becomes public that some bigshot has bought stake.
So its impossible to replicate this strategy and make money in 2023.
We are playing the toughest game with the smartest minds in the world. They are at it 18-20 hours Daily.
and thats my point. i can spend my time more productively and make more money else where.
why bother with researching & investing.
I even shared my formula.
“…In 2-3 years at that rate one would probably pick up a basic…”
I did this for 5 years, i am well versed with basics.
I even read from psychology perspective.
But i am not as good as CA’s, who cook books. i am not as good as quants who do this as a career.
Hence my withdrawl from the field because i found bettwe way of doing money.
*"… RJ or Warren Buffett are a product of years even decades of efforts…"
I disagree with ‘born genius’ hypothesis.
I agree they do things differently.
RJ is notorious for insider buying/selling in his intial days, thats how he made money and became very big.
once he became big fish, he started moving the price with his name itself.
He did pick good companies, but he made good money because of the size of his outsized bets. (ex: titan).
Warren Buffet is very similar. He is son of senator and had lot of connections.
The image of being a child genius is cooked by media.
He was late to tech scene investing by 2 decades.
All his initial money was made from investing in infra/railroads/petroleum, where he used his father’s connections and money to make outsized bets.
The only thing they did very well, riding the winners.
but behind the scenes, its the insider info that helped them a lot to build initial capital.
“The game is to make money consistently from the markets. Till it scales up.”
This is a myth sold by financial magazines/blogs/fund houses to keep you hooked.
My EPF returned better than my stocks/MFs/trading combined.
Of all the 10k people i polled/discussed, only 5 people were profitable in trading.
only 30% investors made money better than their EPF.
Have you ever wondered why FundHouses never publish data about how profitable their investors are?
Or How much profits they have generated?
That alone speaks volumes about state of affairs about investing in general.
Thanks for taking time in sharing your thoughts