Zerodha Fund House at 18 months, and what’s ahead

We launched our first fund at Zerodha Fund House 18 months ago, with the @smallcase.

Quoting @nithin from his tweet:

The idea was to offer simple and cost-efficient index funds and ETFs and stay direct only. Despite not being loud about the AMC, 7 lakh investors have saved ₹6,400 crores in our funds.

The hero fund is LIQUIDCASE ETF at ₹4,700 crores, and this is all in 15 months. LIQUIDCASE has to be one of the most successful Indian retail ETF launches ever.

Thanks to @VishalJain and the team for building this and always being around to help on TradingQnA too. :slight_smile:

Here’s an update from Vishal Jain on where we are and what’s ahead at Zerodha Fund House. Give it a read:

Lastly, Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read all scheme-related documents carefully. You know the drill. :grimacing:

9 Likes

Query on Liquidcase.

When clicking on the link for Liquidcase, I find under Benchmark, SB rate as 2.85%. It says rates sourced from RBI and when I click on that link, it just shows RBI website. Can you please let me know in which section under RBI website, do we get this data.

I thought Banks were allowed to fix the interest rate and RBI do not control the same. It is for this reason, you will find IDFC giving 7% whilst SBI as of today is giving 2.70% and tiered.
The Benchmark rate remain fixed for 1yr, 2yr and 3yr.
I am sure there must be some changes in rates over a period of three years, find it difficult to assume that the rate remained same for each of the three buckets.

Also how is the benchmark arrived, is it the lowest rate offered by banking sector in India or an average taken or is it from RBi website. I want to see this section in RBI, tried searching but could not find the same.

Would like to know how this benchmark is arrived. it is important that this rate should be correct as this is the rate based on which the liquid case is compared.

Axix, icici and Kotak is on tiered basis from 2.75% to 3.25%
IDFC - 3 to 7%
Yes 3 to 5%
DCB - 1.5 to 7%
Canara - 2.70 to 4%

Is the benchmark computed based on PSU bank, then it has some resemblence of average of 2.85. If so this should be mentioned as a note so that investors are aware of the data being presented.

Same thing with inflation data, under sources, it opens up IMF website and I could not find the rate.

@VishalJain

Related query - The return from this liquid case over the last one year was 6.52%. This is after the expense ratio of 0.27%. The purpose is to park free float funds into this fund instead of Bank SB account. So this also means that when I sell I will be subject to STCG of 20%. So is my real return approx 5.12%. Is this a correct assumption.

1 Like

Onwards and upwards! Kudos to the Zerodha Fund House team. Invested in the NLM250 since the NFO.

Recently stumbled upon smallcases from ZFH, why no promotion/marketing for these? The 3-in-1 Multi Asset Allocation looks quite interesting.

IIUC, the benchmark for a fund is whatever the fund wants to benchmark itself against.
(subject to any restrictions specified in the securities regulations.)

The choice of the RBI “Savings Deposit Rate” as the benchmark appears to be a reasonable one, as this fund aims to be extremely liquid (almost like an SB account).

From what i gather, the Savings Deposit Rate was deregulated in India with effect from October 25, 2011, despite strong push-back from the retail banks. Retail banks are no longer restricted/guaranteed the RBI published Savings Deposit Rate in the savings accounts that the retail banks offer. As such, the RBI published rate is just a reference rate that can be used as a benchmark - which this fund appears to be doing.

The current/latest Savings Deposit Rate on the RBI website
appears to be listed under Lending / Deposit Rates section.

Also, searching on the RBI site for the specific phrase Ratios and Rates
lists a bunch of results that include weekly published “Ratios and Rates” circulars.

PDFs of the same appear to be currently available at the link
https://website.rbi.org.in/documents/87730/39710791/T5_DDMMMYYYY.pdf

As an example here’s the most recent one from 23-MAY-2025.


A chart with annual GDP and Inflation (CPI?) is available for India at this page on the IMF website
(and further details in various reports available on the page).

2 Likes

I found this. Thanks. I was seriously thinking of investing, hence started reading, but got put off as I get better rates from a Bank.

What about this, Is my understanding correct.

Apparently the STCG-tax on LIQUIDCASE is charged as per one’s income-tax-slab.
Source: This recent discussion thread.

1 Like

Bank FD gave more returns than LIQUIDCASE. Only advantage is that you can pledge it and use as a “Cash component” with 6.00% haircut. IMO this fund is good only if you pledge it and use it for trading.

I think LIQUIDCASE gave best returns as compared to the other cash component options. Next best in terms of return is LIQUIDADD.

1 Like

Why 12.5% ? This goes to slab.

Tax Implication
All gains/profits from the units of the Liquid ETFs, irrespective of the holding period, will be considered as Short Term Capital Gains (STCG) and will be taxed as per the tax slab of the investor (plus 4% cess and surcharge, if any).

1 Like

LTCG (>2 years) is 12.5% STCG (< 2 years) is as per slab

Nope, not any more if invested ‘On or After 1st April 2023’. Debt funds are treated like junk these days in terms of taxation.

Hybrid funds that have more than 35% but less than 65% Equity have this rate now

2 Likes

Thanks. You are right!

So,

  1. Bank SB ac interest is also on slab rate, Liquidcase is also on slab rate - net effect same.
  2. Few private banks apart from SFB, offer higher rates than Liquidcase and no need to pay Expense ratio of 0.27% and non zerodha customers have to pay brokerage as well like icici direct.

I think the advantage is for traders like @Jack_R pointed out, who can pledge this for their trades as against funds in SB account.

From return perspective for a retail investor, sb interest gives a better return dropping the idea of parking funds in this ETF.

Thanks all for clarifying.

If your income is taxable, growth MF only gets taxed when we sell. That can make a big difference for static capital by compounding over the years.
Pledging on top of that makes it decent for trading. As all (tiny…) growth can be used as capital too.

But yeah, liquidcase is like overnight fund ( so low rates) and with higher expenses. Best use case is pledged capital that you may need to withdraw to fix negative balance. Otherwise go for lower expense funds or alternative ones with higher rates ( and risk )

Small difference. Since liquidcase is a growth fund, tax implications are only at the time of sale. That’s not the case for FD. There is time value of money even for the tax portion.

Did not understand. The money that i keep in my SB account (Not FD) which everyone keeps for their regular expenses, I thought of moving it to this ETF as I thought this will give better returns than SB rate. Money will eventually be used up and hence I have to sell these units and incurr capital gain. I thought this ETF was an alternate to SB account and I get higher return than SB interest rate i.e on my float balance.

But when compared, it does not appeal as I get higher return on SB account - The choice of liquid case was not for long term investment.

I repeat is this ETF an alternate to maintaining funds in SB account which gives return on float balance and return is higher than SB interest rate…

@SpacemanSpiff

Savings bank typically give around 3% ? Overnight finds such as liquid case can give more.
liquidcase current yield after expense will probably be around 5.5-6%. Both on slab.

If your bank pays more than 6%, then yes no point in using liquidcase/overnight funds for your usage.
Anyway the diff wont be much and may not be worth the hassle for everyday expenses. I don’t use it for that.

1 Like

Dear @nithin_kumrr

As soon as possible - Please launch a passively managed aggressive hybrid index fund with a 75:25 equity:debt asset allocation ASAP [ must be re-balanced monthly to maintain the asset allocation]

I think SEBI has already given the go-ahead for this right?
Refer:
https://www.valueresearchonline.com/stories/201566/sebi-to-allow-the-introduction-of-passive-hybrid-funds/

SEBI has permitted the launch of three passive hybrid categories. Then why is it still not available from the Zerodha AMC??

I don’t think starting such a fund would be complicated…

This kind of hybrid index fund is STILL not available in the Indian mutual fund market!!

1 Like